Communicating and Influencing Grade 7 Example Statement (500 Words)
At Grade 7, assessors expect strategic communication: briefing senior leaders or ministers, negotiating with external bodies, or framing an issue so a whole organisation understands it. Show judgement about audience, timing and channel, influencing upwards with confidence, and an outcome with organisational or financial weight.
Example statement
SAs programme lead for a regional employment support scheme, I needed five partner organisations, two councils, a health trust, a college and a charity consortium, to share client data so people stopped repeating their stories to every service. A year of talks had stalled: each partner's legal team had different concerns, trust between the organisations was low, and two partners suspected the largest council wanted control of their data. The scheme served 8,000 people a year, and frontline staff estimated they spent a day a week chasing information the partners already held.
TI was asked to break the deadlock and get a data-sharing agreement signed by all five partners within six months. I reported monthly to the chief officers' joint board.
AMy first move was to stop negotiating by email. I met each chief officer one to one, listened more than I talked, and wrote down what each actually feared: not data breaches in the abstract, but being blamed in public if one occurred. I realised the technical argument was finished and the emotional one was not, so I changed strategy from persuasion to shared risk. I put my own organisation first in the draft, volunteering us for the strictest audit clause, because leading by example cost me little and bought trust. I drafted a one-page set of principles saying what we would share, what we never would, and who would say sorry if something went wrong, and I tested it privately with the two most sceptical partners before showing the group, so they shaped it rather than received it. When the joint workshop came, I asked the partners' communications leads, not just lawyers, into the room, and we worked through three real breach scenarios together; agreeing the public response in advance removed most of the fear. Two partners then raised competing demands on governance, so rather than force a vote I proposed a rotating chair, which let both save face. I logged every concession so no partner could later claim surprise, and summarised each meeting within a day in the same plain language as the principles. Throughout, I sent short weekly updates in plain English to all five chief officers, celebrating each signature publicly, which built momentum and made delay visible without blaming anyone. The charity consortium held out longest over cost; I could not offer money, so I offered the college's training places for their staff instead, a trade their chief executive could sell to her board. At the final meeting I brought a printed agreement, five signature pages, and a photographer, because a signature photographed is a commitment made public.
RAll five partners signed within five months, one month ahead of the deadline I was set. Within a year, shared referrals rose by 30 percent, clients told their story once instead of five times, and the agreement's plain-English principles were reused by two neighbouring regions. The health trust's chief officer told the board the process had rebuilt her confidence in joint working.
Use this as a model, not a script. This is an original example written for this site. Adapt the structure to your own experience — copying it word for word risks plagiarism and will not reflect your evidence.
Why this scores well
- Operates at organisational scale: five external bodies, no line authority, and success measured by signatures and a 30 percent rise in referrals.
- Diagnoses the real blocker (fear of public blame, not legal technicalities) and designs communication to defuse it, including breach-scenario rehearsal.
- Uses influencing levers beyond argument: face-saving proposals, visible momentum, symbolic gestures, and a creative non-cash trade.
What Grade 7 level requires
| Grade | What assessors expect |
|---|---|
| SEO | At SEO level, Communicating and Influencing means winning support across teams and stakeholders without line authority, shaping messages for senior audiences, and turning sceptics into supporters. |
| Grade 7 ← this page | At Grade 7, Communicating and Influencing means shaping understanding at organisational level: briefing senior leaders and ministers, negotiating with external partners, and setting the terms of difficult conversations. |
| Grade 6 | At Grade 6, Communicating and Influencing means persuading boards and directors, building coalitions across directorates, and communicating significant change credibly to large groups of staff. |
Common mistakes at this level
- Avoiding the disagreement: Grade 7 statements need a moment where you argued a position upwards or outwards and it mattered.
- No sense of the political or reputational context, such as media interest or partner sensitivities, shaping your choices.
- A result that stops at 'the meeting went well' with nothing about what was decided, signed, funded or changed afterwards.
Frequently asked questions
Yes, it is one of the strongest choices. Multi-party negotiation shows you reading interests, sequencing conversations, creating face-saving options and closing. Make the scale clear, how many organisations, what was at stake financially or reputationally, and show the tactics: one-to-ones before group sessions, shared risk, visible momentum.
If it genuinely shaped your communication choices, yes. Grade 7 communication often carries reputational risk, and showing you understood how a message would play publicly, in a hearing, in the press, to partners, demonstrates the level. Do not invent drama; a calm example with real stakes beats an exaggerated one.
Strategy beyond the event itself. A good statement handles one briefing or negotiation well. A top one shows you setting a template others reused, managing the political context without being told, arguing an unpopular position upwards and being proved right, and delivering results that persisted, measured in money, agreements or lasting arrangements.
Next step
Get the free Grade 7 statement template pack — the same STAR structure used in this example.
Download the template pack